Here is the mortality graph provided by the U.S. National Cancer Institutes SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) program.
Though nobody wants to take the blame for the rise in breast cancer deaths in the '70s and '80s, lots of people want credit for the fall of breast cancer deaths that began in the '90s. Was it due to a reduction to the exposure of carcinogens, or to better treatment, or to earlier diagnosis?
The fall in breast cancer deaths does not seem to be due to cancer prevention. While the deaths from breast cancer were falling, there was an apparent rise in the incidence of breast cancer cases. Here is the SEER graph for the incidence in breast cancer in the U.S.
Since the breast cancer incidence rose while the deaths from breast cancer dropped, it seemed as though the benefit must have come from better treatment or earlier detection.
A major study, attempting to resolve this issue, was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, in 2005:
Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators. N Engl J Med 353:1784-1792, 2005.
They concluded that that 28 to 65 percent of the sharp decrease in breast cancer deaths from 1990 to 2000 was due to mammograms. The remainder of the improvement was was attributed improved breast cancer treatment.
The study did not take into account the great contribution of precancer treatment to the reduction of breast cancer deaths.
Let's review this SEER data, this time taking into account the diagnosis of DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) a precancer that precedes the development of invasive breast cancer. Here is the SEER data for the incidence of all breast cancer and of DCIS (the precancer for breast cancer).
In the past few decades, there has been a huge rise in the number of diagnosed cases of breast precancers. This is due largely to the use of mammography, which can detect lesions that cannot be found by palpation. When a precancer is detected and removed, the patient does not develop invasive cancer.
The total number of breast cancer cases includes cases of DCIS. If we subtract the number of breast precancer cases (DCIS) from the total number of breast cancer cases, we get the incidence of invasive breast cancer cases. Here is the SEER data.
In this graph, which covers the years 1975 to 2007, the top line of bars (blue) represent the incidence of breast cancers (including invasive and non-invasice lesions). The next lower line of bars (maroon) is the incidence of the invasive breast cancers (the kind that account for breast cancer deaths), and the bottom line of bars represents the rate of DCIS.
Look carefully at the middle bars (maroon), representing the incidence of invasive breast cancers. The graph shows that incidence of invasive breast cancers has actually dropped since the early '90s, as the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS has risen.
Much of the decrease in breast cancer mortality can be accounted for by the diagnosis and treatment of breast precancers. In fact the drop in breast cancer deaths follows the same slope, and has about the same magnitude, as the drop in invasive breast cancers that follows the increase in breast precancer treatments.
- © 2010 Jules Berman tags: cancer prevention, cancer treatment, early treatment, precancer, precancer treatment, preneoplasia, preneoplastic
About my book, Precancer: The Beginning and the End of Cancer. Nearly every type of cancer passes through a precancer phase, during which it cannot metastasize or invade other tissues. While medicine is not always successful in treating or curing advanced stages of cancers, recent advances in our understanding of carcinogenesis have helped us to develop strategies to prevent, diagnose, and treat many cancers at the precancer stage. Research in this field is escalating rapidly as the evidence increasingly shows that the number of annual cancer deaths could be drastically reduced through the effective treatment and cure of precancer lesions. This book begins by explaining why it has been so difficult to cure cancers, followed by a review of precancer biology, with descriptions of the most common precancer lesions. The final chapters provide practical socio-political and medical goals for precancer treatment, including discussions of the economics and politics of treating precancers.
I urge you to read more about this important topic. Google Books has provided a generous preview of this book.
