Devoted to the topic of data specification (including data organization, data description, data retrieval and data sharing) in the life sciences and in medicine.
Friday, February 9, 2018
Vertebrate Evolution Driven by DNA from Infectious Organisms
A prior post listed 7 assertions regarding the role of infectious organisms on the human genome. In the next few blogs we'll look at each assertion, in excerpts from Precision Medicine and the Reinvention of Human Disease. Here's the second:
Some of the key steps in the development of vertebrate animals, and mammals in particular, have come from DNA acquired from infectious organisms.
The human genome has preserved its viral ballast, at some cost. At every cell division, energy
is expended to replicate the genome, and the larger the genome, the more energy must be
expended. Why do we spend a large portion of the energy required to replicate our genome,
on inactive sequences, of viral origin? Why doesn’t our genome simply eject the extra DNA, a
biological process that is commonplace in the evolution of obligate intracellular parasitic organisms?
Maybe it's because we use viral genes to our own advantage.
Two evolutionary leaps, benefiting the ancestral classes of humans, and owed to the acquisition of viral genes, include the
attainment of adaptive immunity and the development of the mammalian placenta. Let’s take
a moment to see how these innovations came about.
Adaptive immunity evolved at about the same time that jawed vertebrates first appeared
on earth. The crucial gene responsible for the great leap to adaptive immunity, the recombination
activating gene (RAG), was stolen from a retrovirus. To understand the pivotal evolutionary
role of RAG, we need to review a bit of high school biology. The adaptive immune
system responds to the specific chemical properties of foreign antigens, such as those that
appear on viruses and other infectious agents. Adaptive immunity is a system wherein somatic
T cells and B cells are produced, each with a unique and characteristic immunoglobulin
(in the case of B cells) or T-cell receptor (in the case of T cells). Through a complex presentation
and selection system, a foreign antigen elicits the replication of a B cell whose unique immunoglobulin
molecule (i.e., so-called antibodies) matches the antigen. Secretion of matching
antibodies leads to the production of antigen-antibody complexes that may deactivate and
clear circulating antibodies, or may lead to the destruction of the organism that carries the
antigen (e.g., virus or bacteria).
To produce the many unique B and T cells, each with a uniquely rearranged segment of
DNA that encodes specific immunoglobulins or T-cell receptors, recombination and
hypermutation must take place within a specific gene region. This process yields on the order
of a billion unique somatic genes, and requires the participation of recombination activating
genes (RAGs). The acquisition of a recombination activating gene is presumed to be the key
evolutionary event that led to the development of the adaptive immune system present in all
jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes). Before the appearance of the jawed vertebrates, this sort of
recombination was genetically unavailable to animals. Our genes simply were not equal to
the task. Retroviruses, however, are specialists at cutting, moving, and mutating DNA. Is it
any wonder that the startling evolutionary leap to adaptive immunity was acquired from
retrotransposons? Thus,we owe our most important defense against infections to genetic material
retrieved from the vast trove of retrovirally derived DNA carried in our genome [33]. As
one might expect, inherited mutations in RAG genes are the root causes of several immune
deficiency syndromes [34,35].
Many millions of years later, vertebrates acquired another gene that did much to enable the
evolution of all mammals. Members of Class Mammalia are distinguished by the development
of the placenta, an organ that grows within the uterine cavity (i.e., the endometrium).
After birth, the placenta must detach from the uterus. You can imagine the delicate balancing
act between attaching firmly to the wall of the uterus and detaching cleanly from the wall of
the uterus. During placental development, large, flat cells called cytotrophoblasts form the
interface between placenta and uterus. To create the thin membrane that borders the lining
of the uterus and that borders the blood received from the uterus in the spaces between the
placental villi, the cytotrophoblasts must somehow fuse into a syncytium (i.e., multinucleate
collections of cells that have fused together by dissolving their individual cytoplasmic membranes).
There is one task at which all animals excel: maintaining a clear separation between one
cell and another. In point of fact, the most distinctive difference between animal cells and all
other cells of eukaryotic origin happens to be the presence of cell junctions, whose purpose
is to bind cells to one another without fusing cells. This being the case, you can see that the
normal direction of animal evolution would preclude the appearance of a gene intended to
form a huge syncytium of placental cells. Whereas animal cells are failures at fusion, viruses
are champions. One of the most often-deployed methods by which viruses invade cells is
through fusion at the cytoplasmic membrane. It happens that retroviral envelope genes,
preserved in the human genome, do a very good job at fusing membranes. Animals captured
a retroviral fusogenic envelope gene and inserted it into one of the first syncytin molecules
involved the development of the placenta. Apparently, this acquisition worked out
so well for mammals that later-evolving mammalian classes made their own retrovirus gene
acquisitions to obtain additional syncytins, thus refining the placenta for their own subclasses
[23,36].
- Jules Berman
key words: precision medicine, evolution, virus, viral, jules j berman Ph.D. M.D.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment